• Today I enjoyed a mini-miracle: I found a lost pair of Christmas pajama pants.

    I had been looking for these pants for several weeks, but to no avail. I had the top, but couldn’t locate the pajama bottoms. Finally, today I looked in a hamper that I had looked in at least twice before but really dug into the bottom of the hamper and “Ta-da!”, my pants were revealed.

    These pants of Holiday Cheer are made of fleece and decorated with images of Rudolph and the Bumble. Most importantly, they are cozy. Very, very cozy.

    Recently at work (via an online meeting, of course) we were talking about what makes us feel cozy. (Yes, an intentionally Safe-for-Work conversation). Fleece definitely tops the list for me. One of my favorite things in the world is the feel of wearing a new, not-yet-washed sweatshirt. (Hey, I’m wearing one of those now and it’s ALSO Christmas-themed. The design on it is a super cool Charlie Brown/Doctor Who mashup–high quality Geekdom).

    Bourbon also makes me feel very cozy, but I opted to go with fleece (my fleece tights, specifically) as my answer for the work discussion. Talking about bourbon isn’t necessarily unsafe for work but probably ill-advised.

    I think the pets will also be happy I discovered my Rudolph/Bumble pants as evidenced by these photos I found of both Pepper and StanLee cuddling with me. Now THAT’S cozy.

    Of course they were experiencing the wonder of my Christmas pants separately. Maybe someday we can all cuddle and be cozy together. Now THAT would be a Christmas Miracle.

  • There’s Always Tomorrow?!

    “Is that promise or a threat?”

    This little nugget of wisdom was one of my family’s favorite zingers. It came to mind recently as I was practicing the Christmas song “There’s Always Tomorrow” from the 1964 televsion special Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.

    This song is performed by Clarice, Rudolph’s love interest. It’s a lovely little bittersweet and melancholy but inspirational tune meant to comfort Rudolph when Santa and his family and all the other reindeer are being assholes because of Rudolph’s red nose.

    And now is probably as good of a time as any to get out my rant about Santa in the Rudolph TV special: Wow, is he a first class jerk. Okay, I want to say something stronger, but this is more or less a family-friendly blog and this is a beloved children’s classic we’re talking about. But I’m almost positive that even as a kid, or especially as a kid, I was convinced Rudolph’s Santa was a Jackass.

    As an adult (really just this year), I’m more sympathetic to Rudolph’s Santa or at least appreciative to the realistic way he’s portrayed. I mean, who said that one has to always be a nice and understanding and woke guy to do compassionate deeds and respect differences? Isn’t it more compelling that this is a story where Santa goes on an inner journey and grows as a person? Doesn’t his jerkiness make the narrative arc more compelling?

    Maybe, probably. But wow, is Santa an a*%hole in Rudolph.

    (A disclaimer that everything I’ve said and will say about Rudolph is based on my memory of how I interpreted the show as a kid, and I probably haven’t watched Rudolph in at least twenty years).

    Anyway, back to Clarice and “There’s Always Tomorrow.” Continuing my run of blog posts about weird and/or suprising lyrics I learn about while working on songs for online church coffee house, check out these “promise or threat”? lyrics:

    “There’s always tomorrow,
    With so much to do,
    And so little time in a day.”

    I assume that’s supposed to be encouraging, and to most kids, it probably is: Hey, tomorrow is another exciting, and fun-filled day! And maybe it would more solidly come across that way if the melody wasn’t in a minor tone. But as an adult, those lyrics can easily seem threatening…THERE’S SO MUCH TO DO!! DEADLINES!! COMMITMENTS! AGRH!!

    I’m also pondering if/how Clarice’s song fits in the small but important genre of “wistful songs of girlfriends in children’s Christmas movies.” Okay, I’m only aware of two other entries for that genre (so maybe it’s more of a subgenre):

    • “My World is Beginning Today” sung by the character Jessica in Santa Claus is Comin’ to Town (another stop-motion animation gem of the Rudolph era) and
    • “When Love is Gone” from The Muppet Christmas Carol,” sung by young Scrooge’s fiance, Belle.

    Unlike the two songs noted above, “There’s Always Tomorrow” is never cut out of broadcasts of Rudolph (at least not as far as I know). I’m annoyed that “My World is Beginning Today” gets cut (for time? quality? contemporary sensibilities?–Jessica does seem like she’s having a drug trip). However, I don’t think I’ve missed “When Love is Gone,” even though there’s been a big splash that it was re-added this year (https://www.vulture.com/2020/12/muppet-christmas-carol-song-when-love-is-gone-song-returning.html).

    Why do I have differing takes on these songs in the same subgenre? What is the feminist and/or patriarchal subtext of the protagonist’s girlfriends’ getting one strange, wistful song that gets cut two out of three times?

    Perhaps pondering this is one of the many things to do tomorrow…and if I’m going to spend so much time and energy on questions like this, no wonder there’s so much to do!

  • Chad recently forced, I mean, inspired, me to go through some boxes of our old clothes and I came across this gem:

    Wrinkled, just like me

    I mean it when I say these boxes* and their contents were Old School. This particular artifact was procured when I worked at B. “Goddamn” Dalton’s (that’s how we, the employees, referred to it) in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, at the Lindale Mall in the mid-90’s. Thanks to Google, I even know now (and find it rather shocking) that Lindale Mall still exists! B. Dalton’s, of course, is long dead, R.I.P.

    Obviously, I got this t-shirt to wear while I dispatched my duties as a “bookseller” during the Christmas retail season (and yes, in Cedar Rapids in the mid-90’s, it was almost 100 percent observance of Christmas).

    My memories of this time are pretty blurry, as it was over 20 years ago. To set the stage: This was WAY before Amazon. “A Cup of Christmas Tea” and “Peef, The Christmas Bear” were the big holiday sellers of that era–but I guess for all I know, they still are.

    I do have a distinct impression that it was rather stressful (comparatively speaking) working retail during Christmas. When my then 5 (or 6?) year-old-niece, Kate, compared me to Bob Cratchit because of the hours I was working, I thought it was pretty funny–and apt. I will always have at least some level of empathy for those working in harried retail environments.

    It was also slightly exciting in a warped way–I did enjoy the “rush” of meeting the demands of frenzied consumers. I also loved my employee discount and getting books and book-related gifts for everyone for Christmas. It was even kind of fun working at mall at Christmastime, with the decorations and the music and all the holiday hoohah.

    However, I never, ever, never ever, want to work retail again.

    Working at B. Daltons was my full-time employment gig for about three years post-college. It was no surprise to me–or anyone–that, as the proud owner of B.A. in Comparative Religion, I was working retail full-time, but I wasn’t satisfied. While I mostly enjoyed my experience and made some marvelous friends, I knew I wasn’t cut out to do retail for my entire career. Eventually my B. Dalton’s experience inspired me to get my Master’s degree in Library Science–along with realizing I could get in-state tuition at a nearby college (The University of Iowa) and that I didn’t need any foreign language proficiency.

    I didn’t end up keeping the B. Dalton’s t-shirt. Taking a photo and reminiscing a bit about those days was sufficient. But I will keep the memories (vague as they are) and the admiration for Young Amy and her endeavors to serve the gods of literary retail.

    And I am SO thankful (at least as a consumer) for online shopping!

    *(Some boxes of clothes even contained treasures from High School but that is a blog post or posts for another time).

  • On the first day of Christmas my true love gave to me…a blog post?!

    That’s right, just in time for the holidays, a new Amy Blogging Challenge: The Twelve Blog Days of Christmas.

    Maybe I should do the Twelve Selfies of Christmas?

    No, this challenge is not going to involve a post for every item in that traditional Christmas carol. Those gifts (strange and bizarre and totally impractical, in my hardly cutting-edge opinion) may provide some inspiration and make an appearance, but they will not be the focus. My only real rule is that I need to write twelve blog posts in a row (starting with today) that somehow have to do with Christmas.

    I am aware that the actual Twelve Days of Christmas start on Christmas Day and run through Epiphany–January 6–so my Twelve Days are not going to exactly line up with their namesake. (At least I think this is the deal. A quick perusal of Wikipedia did not provide confirmation or refutation so I’m going to stick with my understanding).

    And this Twelve Blog Days of Christmas Challenge does NOT supersede or cancel or in any way threaten my completion of my still-in-process 15 Days of Frog and Toad Blog Challenge. The Frog and Toad challenge is not consecutive so the Christmas challenge won’t interrupt it. Furthermore, unlike races, I’ve decided that a blog post can fill two challenges and there is a Frog and Toad story about Christmas Eve so expect an upcoming multipurpose blog post.

    I did briefly toy with somehow more thoroughly addressing the Twelve Days of Christmas carol in this challenge’s inaugural post, but another cursory attempt at Wikipedia research wore me out–it’s too hard for a casual blogger to learn what the gifts are actually referring to.

    As a child of the 80’s, it’s more meaningful–at least nostalgically–to me to research Bob and Doug MacKenzie’s 1982 spoof of the song. And hey, that song expanded my cultural literacy of Canada and taught me about backbacon. I would definitely rather recieve the gifts that Bob and Doug sing about–at least they are mostly consumable (beer, backbackon, french toast) or practical (who couldn’t use another turtleneck, at least those of us in the norther climes?)

    And I JUST learned (or re-learned, maybe I knew this at some point but forgot) that they are saying “Five golden toques” and that a “toque” is a hat. I think I always thought they were saying “toke”–as in a hit on a joint.

    If I was more ambitious, I would come up with my ideal “Twelve Gifts.” Without giving it too much thought (because it feels like it would involve math) I would want to stick with mostly consumables, with highlights including Triscuits, cheese, coffee, tea, wine and culminating with bourbon. (I can’t think of anything clever to substitute for Five Gold/en Rings/Toques).

    Honestly, “The Twelve Days” carol just doesn’t do a lot for me–unless it is the version from the album “John Denver and the Muppets.”

  • “Real, because they can be imagined into being. Because some of the most wonderful things have to be believed to be seen.”

    One of my lines from the play “Uh-Oh, Here Comes Christmas.”

    Our little DIY theater company, Applause, pulled off a bit of a miracle this weekend: We successfully (and I think, enjoyably) presented a live show via Zoom, “Uh-Oh, Here Comes Christmas.” Yes, everything was LIVE except for the music videos at the opening of each act. We didn’t just broadcast a recording of our show over Zoom but actually used the online medium to tell our story.

    We could not have done this without our collective optimism and faith: in each other, in the material, in our ability to generate an audience and in our ability (well, mostly our amazing tech director Connor’s ability and Chad’s ability) to successfully use the needed technology. Once again our director, Gary, inspired and led us with his optimism and vision.

    And we also worked our asses off.

    Nothing can recreate the magic of people getting together for theater–the connection that happens between the actors on stage and between the actors and the audience. (Of course the magic of actors and their friends and families being able to celebrate and socialize together at a favorite local establishment, say, Green Mill, in post-rehearsal and post-show revelry is irreplaceable).

    “Amateurs under pressure”

    But I DO love many aspects of online theater. The convenience factor is huge. Just like with online work, church, etc., I LOVE not having to drive to rehearsal, to be able to make questionable but comfortable clothing choices from the waist down, and having the food and beverages (and easy bathroom access to support all those beverages) of choices at hand. (Yes, my beverages choices for work are different than those for theater–although sometimes similar to church events).

    I reveled in not having to do “strike” and take the set down and clean up theater (although we did have quite the various home studios set up, we could dismantle those on our own time).

    But my comfort and ease aside, it was absolutely wonderful to be able to share our theatrical endeavors with many more people than we could have in person. Presenting a show online allowed friends and family to participate in our wild and crazy little miracle who otherwise wouldn’t have been able to. Folks who otherwise may have been thwarted by distance, health, transportation, or just inclination (I have total respect for people who don’t want to go out and about in the world for entertainment, pandemic or no, if it requires wearing pants) could be part of our show.

    Because the audience is absolutely a integral part of the show–even when we can’t see them and just have to believe they are there and imagine we have a connection with them. (And while we do have amazing powers of imagination, all the feedback and kudos after the show is most welcome validation).

    There are so many words and ideas that I love from “Uh-Oh,” but one of the most eye-opening for me is when I got to describe a juggler’s performance as a gift where he held nothing back in his generosity. I won’t deny that I mainly do theater for self-serving, narcissistic reasons, and getting to do it is definitely a gift for me, especially when “normal” theater isn’t possible.

    But if my efforts can also be viewed as a gift I give–even a goofy, impractical, weird gift that’s the wrong size that you might want to return–now that’s a miracle.

  • Although the AARP did officially start trying to recruit me this year, I don’t consider myself a “Golden Girl” yet.

    But I did tackle the theme song for the television show “The Golden Girls” at a recent church online Coffee House.

    My inspiration for choosing the song (“Thank You For Being a Friend”) was topical–a song of thanks the Saturday after Thanksgiving definitely seemed appropriate.

    I did not choose the song because I’m a huge Golden Girls fan. Oh, I certainly watched it back in the day when it originally aired and enjoyed it, but I don’t remember that much about it and I’ve been mostly oblivious to it’s resurgence. (When it first was on TV I was in high school, and my friend Jenny declared that I was either the “Dorothy” or “Sophia” of our group, depending on how bitchy I was on any given day).

    I also decided on this song because it more or less fell in the sweet spot of songs that are in my vocal range that I can also more or less play the chords on.

    I was surprised and stymied by the bridge–I had no idea the song had a bridge, much less one that was so vocally and lyrically weird:

    “And when we die and float away, into the night, the Milky Way. You’ll hear me call as we ascend. I’ll say your name then once again”

    What’s going on here? Are these friends with a suicide pact?

    But I wasn’t going to let this goofy-ass lyrical meandering thwart me, OR be defeated by the melody I didn’t know and couldn’t quite figure out. I just sang something that was as close as I could come to matching the actual song that fit the chords. Really, who in the world was going to know this part of the song well enough to know that I wasn’t faithfully recreating it. And if someone did notice, I could always claim it was an artistic “choice”–a choice not to bother to learn the song, but still, a choice.

    And most importantly, a choice to sing.

    Recently I had a conversation with friends about singing–why we love it, how it is primal and rooted in our very beings, how vulnerable it makes us feel and how absolutely terrifying it can be to sing in front of other people.

    This week I discovered a poem with this line:

    “Here is where I began to look with my own eyes and listen with my ears and sing my own song, shaky as it is.”

    –from “Map of the Journey” by Victoria Safford

    This line really “struck a chord” with me (pun intended) because I frequently get shaky when I sing, especially if I’m trying to play piano at the same time. (Yes, I do realize the poem doesn’t have to refer to a literal song).

    Any song we sing becomes “ours”–because the song is made with our voice and our body, it is our song, at least for that moment (even if it is a cover of a silly 70’s song).

    Perhaps one of the reasons many of us love singing so much is because it IS terrifying and makes us vulnerable, and when we find the courage to sing anyway, it’s exhilarating..

    Like one of the characters I play in our upcoming Christmas show, I/we can approach life with:

    “Head back, eyes closed, voice raised in whatever song I can muster the courage to sing.”

    from Robert Fulghum’s “Uh-Oh, Here Comes Christmas”

    I’m not sure what my through line is for this post (yeah, I couldn’t resist saying “through line”) except courage. It takes courage to be a “Golden Girl,” and courage to have a friend and be friend, and courage to sing,

    And it takes courage to listen to your aging friends sing.

    *I do NOT expect to be doing this song anytime soon, as wonderful as it is, because sadly it doesn’t fit in my musical sweet spot.

  • I LITERALLY ran into some teenagers today.

    One of my pet peeves is when I think people misuse the word “literally,” (even/especially my imaginary friend/favorite podcast host Luke Burbank) so I want to be clear that I was really running (although slowly) when I ran into some teenagers who were blocking the sidewalk by walking two abreast.

    I’m not proud of this act of running aggression, but I thought they would move out of the way. I’m hardly a stealthy ninja runner, and I assumed they would eventually hear the loud breathing of the middle-aged woman coming up behind them. I guess not. And by the time I realized they weren’t going to move and yelled “Excuse me!” it was too late to stop. But don’t worry, I didn’t do a full body slam into them and no one got hurt–it was more a gentle shove as I pushed through them. I’m sure they were more perplexed than anything.

    But yes, I may have been unreasonably brash, as one of my other, even more firmly held pet peeves is oblivious people who block the sidewalk when they are on their strolls and I am running. This irritation combined with my obsessive desire to never stop while on a run (even to pet cute dogs or talk to friends–much less accommodate discourteous walkers) means I am a force to be reckoned with. Okay, a week and annoying force, but still a force. (I DO stop for traffic and, I feel I must confess, occasionally to walk when I am just beat)

    I came close to literally running into many other people today on my “virtual” Moustache Run Half Marathon. Yes, it was 50 degrees in late November so apparently other people thought they had some business being out and about to take advantage of the last precious warm weather. The Stone Arch Bridge was a maddening obstacle course of human bodies.

    So my run was irritating, and slow, and humbling, and exhausting, and even a little painful (thanks to a blister), and uncomfortable (my hands were numb even though the rest of my body was at a fine temperature) and momentarily disquieting. I wouldn’t say I was exactly “lost” but after my turnaround at the halfway point I ran by the Stone Arch Bridge and briefly had to make an exception to my “No-stopping” rule–getting my bearings is easier when I’m not running for some reason–to realize I had run past the bridge. Luckily the throng of people on it made it easy to spot so I didn’t have to call Chad to come rescue me.

    My Garmin watch even had a total fail and gave me wildly high inaccurate heart rate readings throughout my run.

    AND still I love that I got to do this run–even though, to repeat–I was very slow. This literally was the WORST HALF MARATHON I have ever run. There are several mitigating factors I can point to, and this would have been a fine training run, but for a “race” it was terrible.

    But I wasn’t sure I could do it, and I did. THAT felt really good.

    More importantly, I now feel like I’ve earned my Moustache Run sweatshirt, the most excellent, most comfortable sweatshirt I have ever owned. Perhaps my favorite piece of clothing ever. I even got a cool stocking cap! The Moustache Run definitely has amazing swag.

    Technically, I could have earned that sweatshirt on Nov. 7 when I ran a Half Marathon (which was faster, though still slow), but that was my (self-proclaimed) “Post-Election it Looks Like Biden Really Won Thank God” Half Marathon where I wore my Biden t-shirt even though it was too hot and sticky for it. I could have also counted that as my Mustache Run (it just has to be completed between Nov. 1 and Dec. 15) but I’ve discovered that one of my self-created rules for life is that races shouldn’t double-dip like that.

    More importantly, I didn’t yet have my race bling at that time so I couldn’t take selfies with my most awesome medal.

    Theoretically, I still have two-ish weeks yet to do another Half Marathon where I don’t totally suck but with cold weather and whatnot that doesn’t seem likely to happen. I’m definitely going to keep running (so the world will not be spared from Amy running selfies), and doing cardio workouts (thank you stationary bike) but long distance running requires a whole different mojo that unfortunately dissipates pretty quickly. (Not to worry–I can build it back up when the spring rolls around).

    Teenagers take note–the sidewalks of NE Minneapolis aren’t safe for you yet!

  • Once upon a time, in a galaxy far, far away, I used to successfully use a phone to communicate with people. No, not with texting, but in actually using the phone to make and receive calls. I used to have conversations with people by using a phone to talk with and listen to them.

    I think I even enjoyed it.

    This seems remarkable to me now as I currently have a strong dislike for talking on the phone. I almost never talk to people on the phone unless I’m trying to solve a problem or accomplish something like scheduling an appointment or complaining about a missing Instacart bag. The only person I regularly call for personal reasons is my 80-something year old friend, and I get rather stressed about doing it.

    It’s also remarkable to me how drastically my use of and attitude towards phones has changed in my lifetime. Obviously, this has largely been driven by technological changes.

    When I was a kid, not only did we not have cell phones, we had a party line. This meant that several neighbors shared the same phone line so not only did we not have a phone with us at all times, we couldn’t even be guaranteed we could use our own home phone whenever we wanted without some awkward social negotiation with the neighbors.

    My sister had this Bicentennial candlestick phone!

    I could do a deep dive here on the technology and design of all the different types of phones I’ve experienced in my life–I’ll just say in roughly 40 years of being a phone user I’ve encountered everything from a candelstick phone to my current moto x4. (I AM devoutly anti i-Phone, for admittedly no good reason). Throughout my adult life I have been plagued by sporadic but traumatic stress dreams of trying to use a rotary phone in an emergency and getting to the end of the number and making a mistake and having to start all over.

    As a rural kid, I was also limited to who I could call without it being “long-distance.” I only had one friend, my good friend Jennifer, that I could call and not have to worry about wracking up extra charges. Sharing an area code was an instant bond. (My mom was pretty liberal about long distance calls, but still…).

    I think I’ve also grown to dislike talking on the phone because of my poor hearing and people not being able to hear me. Between bad cell phone connections and my apparent inability to successfully place a smart phone next to a my face, my phone calls are often a continuous series of “What?!”

    My anti-phone orientation was working okay for me, but life in the Times of COVID is causing me to re-think my attitude toward the humble phone call. In some ways, my social life now is more like it was when I was a child on the tundra outside of Augusta, Wisconsin. I can’t take it for granted that I’m actually going to reguarly interact with anyone outside of immediate family (consisting of Chad and the pets) in person.

    So I was already thinking about re-thinking my non-use of phones, when I heard about this study of “Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me”: Phone Calls Build Stronger Connections Than Texting. Well, of course. Obvious, but I needed this inspiration to attempt to change my ways.

    I’m really struck by this heading in the story: “Phone calls aren’t as awkward as they might seem.” Eurkeka, that’s it–phone calls DO feel terribly awkward now. After going so long without talking to someone on the phone, it just seems really uncomfortable to start now. How do I call someone seemingly out of the blue without scaring them (no, I’m not calling because it’s an emergency or bad news). How in the heck do I actually END a phone call without seeming rude?

    But awkwardness (and even inconvenience) seems like a small price to pay for getting to stay connected to people.

    I may have better odds of success if I think of phone calls as a Zoom interaction without video. Because strangely enough, I have not had it with online meetings, church, Happy Hours, play rehearsal, etc. In fact, I often prefer being able to do all these things from the comfort of my home (in sweatpants, with alcohol at hand, and I do make liberal use of both the video and audio mute function). And I have now figured out how to make phone calls via my laptop and/or with using earbuds, so hopefully the “What?” factor will be significantly reduced.

    So I’m going to try and re-develop my phone conversation muscles. My apologies in advance for any dorkiness around this endeavor (which may include sending you this blog as exposition).

  • As Minnesotans have been busily trying to finish up raking their leaves before a winter storm rolled in (or so I’ve been told–I don’t actually do home maintenance work. Okay, I shovelled a few steps today, it was a holiday after all) I turn my attention to the Frog and Told story, “The Surprise.”

    That’s right, it’s been on hiatus, but I have NOT forgotten about or given up on my Frog and Toad Blogging Challenge! I did say there was no time limit for completing it.

    In “The Surprise,” both Frog and Toad decide to suprise each other by raking the leaves in the other’s yard. They happen to go to each other’s place at the same time and successfully and secretly rake each other’s leaves into big piles. However, on their respective ways home, a big wind blows all the leaves around (they apparently missed the important step of putting the leaves in a yard waste bag).

    The story ends with each of them coming home to the same leaf situation they left with, but happily thinking to themselves “My friend will be so pleased and surprised that his leaves are taken care of–I’ll deal with this mess tomorrow.”

    Maybe I’m just in a mood, but this story challenges me. I get that it’s lovely that they did something nice for each other without expecting any recognition, and that doing something kind and generous for someone makes us feel good. But shouldn’t doing something for someone actually benefit the receiver?

    It seems kind of selfish just to focus on how giving makes us as the giver feel.

    Perhaps I’m just sensitive about stories that explore giving. I’ve always been extremely annoyed by the O. Henry story of “The Gift of the Magi.” I’ve never found the gifts the poor young couple exchange in that story to be wise or sweet but just stupid. (Super quick recap: She cuts and sells her hair to buy him a pocket watch chain, he sells his watch to buy her a comb).

    For that matter, the gifts the Magi brought for Jesus don’t seem all that hot. I know, I’m not the first one to point this out, but gold, frankincense, and myrrh for an infant? I guess eventually Mary and Joseph could sell the gold for food and baby supplies.

    At least Frog and Toad don’t end up any worse than they started out–since neither one of them apparently understand bag technology, they both would have had to rake their leaves twice. And they got a little variety by raking someone else lawn.

    Hmmm, for all we know, Frog and Toad continue to spend their fall days in a sisyphean purgatory of constantly raking leaves into piles that get blown away (good exercise, I guess?) Or perhaps they both eventually just say “Oh, F#$k it” and let the leaves blow around as they will without worrying about bourgeoisie standards of lawn care.

    My perception on gift-giving could also be skewed because I have a snarky monologue about the subject in our upcoming Christmas show (over Zoom of course), “Uh-Oh, Here Comes Christmas” (https://www.act-mn.org/). (Really a lovely an life-affirming show that you should see, don’t let the snarky monologue mislead you).

    “Uh-Oh’s” cast and crew from last year in The Before Times…yeah, a shameless attempt at publicity for this year’s show.

    I might not totally agree with the wisdom of this Frog and Toad offering, or even be sure what it is, but as usual, our little amphibian friends made me think. And when I’m not feeling surly, I do agree that giving with an open heart without expecting thanks or anything in return is a blessing to us as the gift givers.

    And, yard bags are totally essential.

  • My mom died 20 years ago today. She was 64. She died at a nursing home in Chippewa Falls, WI, approximately 10 weeks after she was diagnosed with colon cancer. She was very sick those entire 10 weeks and her death felt both drawn out and sudden.

    I was in the room when she died, but I’d been in and out of her room that day and was actually sitting in the common area for the most of the time right before she died–the “death rattle” of her breathing was too hard for me to listen to for long. A staff member came to get me right before my mom died.

    I wish I had known or understood when she died (and for many years afterwards) that it was “okay” to be devastated and completely messed up by her death. I wish I had known that grief is hard work and it’s a slow process that takes time and is never really done–although even now that I’m older and presumably wiser I’m still not willing to put in all the time and effort to really process what I need to. 

    I wish I knew how to share these experiences and learnings with friends dealing with the death of a parent without making their grief about me or seeming like I’m giving advice. I wish I knew how to be vulnerable and empathetic without creating an “Amy wants attention” moment.

    I feel “cheated” out of years and years with my mother that I always expected to have, but I also feel relieved that I didn’t have to experience a long, slow decline in her physical or mental health, much less have her isolated in a care facility during this Pandemic. 

    The most profound revelation I’ve had since my mom died is realizing the depth of loss over things I’ve missed out on with my mom. I’ve had 20 years of her NOT being here–not seeing any of my plays, not knowing all the pets we’ve had, not being mystified/worried by my running, not pretending that she always wanted to be vegetarian now that I am (more or less), not getting to know that I started playing drums again.

    And how did 20 years go by? Yes, this makes me feel very old and disoriented. My mom has been dead so long that she entirely missed the era of social media. And I’m FIFTY–only 14 years younger than my mom was when she died. If I’m lucky and I live to a “reasonable” age I’ll have spent more of my life without my mom than with her.

    So yes, grief is hard work and you’re never “over” the death of someone you love, but I also don’t want to wallow, and finding that balance is tricky for me. I’m think I’m still shying away from and dancing around all the hard feels about my mom’s death, but I’m also grateful that I’m basically an optmistic person and I’ve had the resiliency to carry on. And I want my experience of my mom’s memory to be weighted on the side of love and gratitude and laughter rather than sadness and anger. 

    So today is a very BIG DEAL and an important milestone, and also just another day, full of mundane concerns and pleasures. I ran, did laundry, attended several work meetings (virtually, of course) and struggled with writing a report, ate more crackers than I intended, and am now drinking wine and bourbon. 

    I don’t have a snappy way to end this post–not that I ever do, but I usually try. For the last 20 years, I have missed my mom every single day, and I keep hoping that loving and grieving her will make me a more wise and compassionate and present and loving person that lives and appreciates life and my friends and family to the fullest.

    …and I keep falling short.

    But I keep trying. So back to laundry (and wine and bourbon).